- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources1
- Resource Type
-
0000000001000000
- More
- Availability
-
10
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Catherine H. Freudenreich (1)
-
Katherine Wu (1)
-
Kristin Andrykovich (1)
-
Lauren Verra (1)
-
Rebecca E. Brown (1)
-
Robyn Jong (1)
-
Stacey Fair (1)
-
Xiaofeng A. Su (1)
-
#Tyler Phillips, Kenneth E. (0)
-
#Willis, Ciara (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Abramson, C. I. (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Adams, S.G. (0)
-
& Ahmed, K. (0)
-
& Ahmed, Khadija. (0)
-
& Aina, D.K. Jr. (0)
-
& Akcil-Okan, O. (0)
-
& Akuom, D. (0)
-
& Aleven, V. (0)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
(submitted - in Review for IEEE ICASSP-2024) (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Expanded CAG/CTG repeats are sites of DNA damage, leading to changes in repeat length. To determine how ssDNA gap filling affects repeat instability, we inserted (CAG)70 or (CTG)70 repeats into a single-strand annealing (SSA) assay system such that resection and filling in the ssDNA gap would occur across the repeat tract. After resection, when the CTG sequence was the single-stranded template for fill-in synthesis, repeat contractions were elevated and the ssDNA created a fragile site that led to large deletions involving flanking homologous sequences. In contrast, resection was inhibited when CTG was on the resected strand, resulting in repeat expansions. Deleting Rad9, the ortholog of 53BP1, rescued repeat instability and lost viability by increasing resection and fill-in speed. Deletion of Rad51 increased CTG contractions and decreased survival, implicating Rad51 in protecting ssDNA during gap filling. Taken together, DNA sequence within a single-stranded gap determines repair kinetics, fragility, and repeat instability.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
